Global Economics

Sweatshops

Living Wage Rights

Housing

Immigration

Sex Discrimination

Health & Safety

Social Justice

Children

Fair Trade

Delegations

Border Delegations

NIU Delegations

Delegation Photos

Contact Us

Become Involved

 

 


Global Economics

Papers presented at the South-North Exchange 2006 Conference on Free Market
Fundamentaliism, a project of LatCrit, Inc., (Latina and Latino Critical
Legal Theory Conferences)
, May 18-20, 2006, Bogota, Colombia, a production of Universidad de los Andes and Seattle University School of Law, have been published by SEATTLE UNIVERSITY JOURNAL FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE.


The Globalizing Economy and the Divisive Immigration Debate

Although there has been an increased focus on Mexican immigration to the United States, Mexicans have been migrating north for better opportunities since our nation was formed.  When the U.S. gained control of the Southwest, the Mexican population that was living there became U.S. citizens.  The expanding nation needed workers and many looked to the Mexican-American population already living within its borders.  This use of Mexican labor not only laid a foundation for employers, but it also established a resource for working poor Mexicans as they traveled north to earn a better wage and hopefully a better life.  Over the years, U.S. and Mexican public policy has furthered immigration and the use of Mexican labor by U.S. employers.  The historical foundation for immigration was solidified with the passage of NAFTA in 1994.  Supporters of NAFTA argued that it would bring more jobs to Mexico and slow immigration.  But the proliferation of U.S. factories only furthered the atmosphere for exploitation of workers on the Mexican side of the border, did not deliver on increased prosperity for the migrant laborer,  and drove more Mexicans to seek a living wage north of the border.  As the nation’s politicians look to “fix the immigration problem,” it is important to understand the history, politics, and economics behind the process.  U.S. corporations earn profits off of the labor of working class Mexicans who want a job that will allow them to feed, clothe, and educate their children.   Possibly the flow of illegal immigration would stop at the doorstep of the U.S. if the wages and working conditions in the maquiladora jobs that lure the migrants from the South allowed them to care for their families.  Most of them do not.  This struggle and the circumstances that created their lives of contestation are what continue to drive so many Mexican migrant laborers to follow in the footsteps of the millions before them, who have historically traveled north for a better life.

Forthcoming Topics on the Relationship between  free trade and immigration

Historical Context for Mexican Immigration

Push and Pull for Labor and a Better Way of Life

Immigration Policy over the Years, U.S. and Mexico

Globalization’s Role in Immigration

NAFTA’s Effect on Immigration-Free Trade

Immigration’s Impact on Family

Immigration’s Impact on Gender

Creating an Overlooked Underclass in the United States

Closed Borders vs. Open Borders

Trade and Migration

Congressional Initiatives

State Initiatives

Sustainable Ways to Address Immigration

Migrants, Border Crossings and Human Rights

Fair Trade as a Viable Alternative

CAFTA-The Outbreak of Free Trade


We welcome your feedback!  Send your comments to: Editor, WOB, Inc.


Articles

The Global Economy: Policy and Protest

1.  Maude Barlow, "What is the FTAA?," (pdf) Council of Canadians, 2000  

2.  Maude Barlow, "Summing Up the Summit in Quebec," (pdf) April, 2001


Books

Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri, EMPIRE (Harvard Press 2000)   
Quote from the authors’ preface

 Empire is materializing before our very eyes. Over the past several decades, as colonial regimes were overthrown and then precipitously after the Soviet barriers to the capitalist world market finally collapsed, we have witnessed an irresistible and irreversible globalization of economic and cultural exchanges.  Along with the global market and global circuits of production has emerged a global order, a new logic and structure of rule – in short a new form of sovereignty.  Empire is the political subject that effectively regulates these global exchanges, the sovereign power that governs the world.

Lori Wallach, Patrick Woodall, Ralph Nader, Whose Trade Organization?: A Comprehensive Guide to the World Trade Organization, Second Edition  


FILMS

The Corporation (documentary)
a film by Mark Achbar, Jennifer Abbott and Joel Bakan,
(2003)

Website: www.thecorporation.com/

Film review: http://smartpei.typepad.com/robert_patersons_weblog/2004/03/the_corporation.html

Summary:  A powerful 2.5 hour examination of the origins of the legal fiction of corporate personhood.  The authors propose an understanding of abusive corporate behavior as one might examine the distorted thinking of a criminal psychopath.  Viewers come to understand not only why some of the worlds largest multinational corporations have become so big, powerful and seemingly immune to accountability, but also why consumers need to be looking for ways to take back control of the monstrous unregulated growth of some corporations whose existence is defined by a voracious appetite for new markets to exploit and new products to sell with no concern whatsoever for their effect on our health, natural resources, environment or the well-being of our descendants. 


BULLSHIT (2005) featuring Indian anti-globalization activist Vandana Shiva
http://www.cinemaguild.com/catalog/catalog_new_releases.htm

Click here for summary and to order the film BULLSHIT:
http://smartpei.typepad.com/robert_patersons_weblog/2004/03/the_corporation.html